Racha,Ghina,Rami :The accused was subpoenaed

On 21 of July 1992, the accusation was subpoenaed to the court to attend the pretrial for committing "Spinneys burglary". According to the prosecutor's statement, the accused was arrested by the virtue of article : "130 criminal law". The defendant was accused for committing the burglary felony. In witnesses, the plaintiff built his accusation on the following evidences: First- video tape Second- eye witnesses Third- finger prints On the other side, the defendant in his plea requested the innocence for his client since the evidences are circumstantial and do not conform to the article 130 . As a jury, we find as majority that the defendant is not guilty .